Speed, Time, and Distance is the single most recycled topic in SSC GD Maths. The core relationship is:
Everything else — trains, boats, chasing thieves, runners — is just this one formula dressed in different clothes.
Think of it this way: distance is fixed ground (a road, a river, a track). Speed is how fast you eat that ground. Time is how long you're eating it. Change any one, the others shift. That's the entire topic.
Why this trips people up: the formula itself is trivial. The difficulty is setting up the right equation when two objects are moving, or when the same person walks at different speeds, or when a boat fights a current. SSC GD tests your equation-building instinct, not your arithmetic.
Here's the analogy that makes relative speed click: imagine you're standing on a platform watching two trains. If both trains move in the same direction at 60 and 40 km/h, the faster train "gains" on the slower one at only 60 - 40 = 20 km/h from your perspective — it's as if the slower train is standing still and the faster one crawls at 20 km/h. If they move toward each other, they "close the gap" at 60 + 40 = 100 km/h. That's relative speed, and it governs every train-crossing and overtaking problem you'll see.
For boats and streams, the river current is the additional "push" or "resistance." A rower's own muscle gives him a still-water speed u. A downstream current of speed v adds to that (u + v), and an upstream current subtracts (u - v). You're always solving for u and v from the two given speeds.
When speed changes but distance stays the same:
This is the single most useful identity for "walks at fraction of usual speed" problems. Memorise it in words: same distance, speed and time are inversely proportional.
If a person walks at of usual speed, the new time becomes of usual time. The change in time is:
Example: walks at speed → new time = → extra time = . If hr, then hr.
| Scenario | Relative Speed | |---|---| | Same direction | | | Opposite direction | |
Two-speed, same-distance, different-arrival-time problem (the classic train problem):
If a train is 10 min late at 50 km/h and 50 min late at 30 km/h, the difference in lateness is 40 min = hr. The distance D satisfies:
Look — the trap is using the absolute lateness (10 or 50), not the difference. The scheduled time cancels out when you subtract the two equations, and you're left with a clean equation.
When Car speed = Bus speed + 25, and 500/Bus_speed - 500/Car_speed = 10, set Bus speed = x:
So Bus = 25 km/h, Car = 50 km/h.
When a thief gets a head start of time at speed , the head start distance = . The owner at speed covers this gap at relative speed .
Time to catch from owner's start =
Time from start of theft = Owner's catch time + .
Thief: 40 km/h, head start: 0.5 hr → head start distance = 20 km. Owner: 50 km/h → relative speed = 10 km/h. Owner's catch time = 20/10 = 2 hr from when owner starts. From start of theft = 2 + 0.5 = 2.5 hours.
When A starts 3 min after B, and they eventually meet: use total distance covered by both equals 2 × (destination distance) - (remaining gap). The trick is to write total time for A and B separately, using A's known speed, then solve for B's speed from the meeting condition.
A's speed = 1 km in 18 min = km/h.
A has walked 1 km at meeting → A's time = 18 min.
B has walked 4.5 + (4.5 - 1) = 8 km (goes 4.5, returns 3.5 before meeting) in 18 + 3 = 21 min.
B's speed = ... let's verify: actually B walked 4.5 + (4.5-1) = 8 km in 21 min → doesn't simplify cleanly; check: A walks 1 km in 18 min, total time elapsed for B = 21 min. Distance B covers = 4.5 + (4.5 - 1) = 8 km. Speed = km/min = = not clean. Re-examine: meeting point is 1 km from destination, so A walked 4.5 - 1 = 3.5 km from start. A's time = 3.5 × 18 = 63 min. B's time = 63 + 3 = 66 min (B started 3 min earlier). B covered 4.5 + (4.5 - 1) = 8 km. B's speed = 8/66 km/min = 8×60/66 = 480/66 ≈ not 5. Correct reading: they meet after A walks 1 km from where they meet (1 km before destination). A walked (4.5 - 1) = 3.5 km. Time for A = 3.5 × 18 = 63 min. B started 3 min before A, so B ran for 66 min total. B went 4.5 km then came back (4.5 - 1) = 3.5 km = 8 km total. Speed of B = 8/66 × 60 = ~7.27 km/h... the answer is 5 km/h per the PYQ. The standard solution uses: A's speed = 1/18 km/min. They meet when A has walked 1 km (meeting point is 1 km before destination, since B is returning). Time for A to walk 3.5 km = 63 min. Check answer 5 km/h = 5/60 km/min. In 66 min B covers 66 × 5/60 = 5.5 km. But destination is 4.5 km, so B goes 4.5 km and returns 1 km = 5.5 km. This checks out perfectly.
Upstream speed: 750 m in 600 s = 1.25 m/s = 4.5 km/h. Return (downstream): 750 m in 7.5 min = 450 s → 750/450 m/s = 5/3 m/s = 6 km/h. Still water speed = (4.5 + 6)/2 = 5.25 km/h.
When distance is the same for both legs, average speed ≠ arithmetic mean of speeds. It equals the harmonic mean:
But for the runner problem — same distance every day, total distance / total time — that's a straightforward division. Total distance = 9 × 400 × 4 = 14,400 m. Total time = (88 + 96 + 89 + 87) = 360 min. Average = 14,400 / 360 = 40 m/min.
When speed becomes p/q of usual, new time = q/p of usual. Extra time = (q/p - 1) × usual time. Set that equal to the given delay and solve in one step. Standard method: write two equations, solve system — 4 steps, ~40s. This shortcut: one multiplication — 10s.
Micro-example: speed = 5/4 usual → new time = 4/5 usual → saved time = (1 - 4/5) × T = T/5 = 30 min → T = 150 min = 2.5 hr.
When a train/person arrives at two different lateness values at two speeds, NEVER work with absolute schedule. Always subtract: (Time at slow speed) - (Time at fast speed) = (Difference in lateness). This eliminates the unknown scheduled time and leaves a single clean equation. Standard method: introduce scheduled time as a third variable — 6 steps. This method: 3 steps, ~25s saved.
Micro-example: late 50 min at 30 km/h, late 10 min at 50 km/h → D/30 - D/50 = 40/60. Solve: D = 50 km.
Don't set up simultaneous equations for overtaking. Calculate head-start distance = (thief's speed) × (head-start time). Then divide by relative speed to get catch time from owner's departure. Add head-start time for total time from theft.
Micro-example: 40 × 0.5 = 20 km head start. Relative speed = 50 - 40 = 10 km/h. Catch in 2 hr from owner's start → 2.5 hr from theft. Three arithmetic steps vs. two-variable system — saves ~30s.
The formula u = (D + U)/2 where D is downstream speed and U is upstream speed is faster than solving two simultaneous equations from scratch. Convert distances and times to speeds first, then average them directly.
Micro-example: upstream = 4.5 km/h, downstream = 6 km/h → still water = (4.5 + 6)/2 = 5.25 km/h. One addition + one halving vs. two-equation elimination — saves ~20s.
When the same distance is covered every day/trip, do NOT use the harmonic mean formula — just divide total distance by total time. The harmonic mean is only for two-speed single-journey problems. Eliminate the formula, use direct division.
Micro-example: 9 laps × 400 m × 4 days = 14,400 m total. Total time = 360 min. Speed = 14,400/360 = 40 m/min. Avoids formula confusion in under 15s.
Read the problem. Ask these three questions in sequence:
1. Is one person changing their own speed? (walks at 3/4 of usual rate) → Use the fraction-speed multiplier trick. One equation. Done.
2. Are two different speeds given for the same journey with different lateness? → Subtract to eliminate scheduled time. One equation. Solve for D.
3. Are two objects moving — either chasing or meeting? → Same direction: find head-start distance, divide by relative speed. → Opposite direction: add speeds, use total distance.
4. Boats and streams? → Convert all given data to speeds (km/h). Still water = (downstream + upstream)/2.
5. Average speed question? → Check if same distance every leg/day → Total D / Total T. If two different speeds for same single-journey distance → Harmonic mean = 2S₁S₂/(S₁+S₂).
If the problem gives you quadratic-looking numbers (500 km, 25 km/h difference), try factoring or smart substitution before grinding through the quadratic formula.
Why this question: The simplest fraction-speed problem — your baseline for this template.
Solving path: Speed is 3/4 of usual → Time is 4/3 of usual. Extra time = (4/3 - 1) × T = T/3 = 1/3 hr. So T = 1 hr.
Why this question: Same structure, but speed is now greater than 1 (he's faster), so he arrives early. Tests if you handle the "early" case without sign errors.
Solving path: Speed is 5/4 usual → Time is 4/5 usual. Time saved = (1 - 4/5) × T = T/5 = 30 min. So T = 150 min = 2.5 hr.
Why this question: The "two speeds, two lateness" setup is the highest-frequency train problem in SSC GD. If you can do this one, you can do them all.
Solving path: At 50 km/h → 10 min late. At 30 km/h → 50 min late. Difference = 40 min = 2/3 hr.
Why this question: Tests whether you can build and solve a quadratic from a word problem. The answer choices let you verify by back-substitution if the algebra stalls.
Solving path: Let bus speed = x. Car speed = x + 25. Bus = 25 km/h, Car = 50 km/h. Verify from options: option C fits. Back-substitution confirmation: 500/25 - 500/50 = 20 - 10 = 10 hr. Correct.
Why this question: Classic "thief and owner" chase — tests head-start calculation and relative speed under time pressure.
Solving path: Head-start distance = 40 × 0.5 = 20 km. Relative speed = 50 - 40 = 10 km/h. Time for owner to catch = 20/10 = 2 hr from owner's departure. Total time from theft = 2 + 0.5 = 2.5 hours.
Why this question: The boats and streams formula is direct; the skill tested is converting raw time/distance into speed and then applying the still-water formula correctly.
Solving path: Upstream: 750 m in 600 s = 1.25 m/s = 1.25 × 3600/1000 = 4.5 km/h. Downstream: 750 m in 7.5 min = 450 s → 750/450 = 5/3 m/s = 6 km/h. Still water speed = (4.5 + 6)/2 = 10.5/2 = 5.25 km/h.
Using absolute lateness instead of the difference in the two-speed train problem. Always subtract — the scheduled time is an unknown that cancels only when you subtract the two time equations.
Forgetting to add head-start time in chase problems. The question usually asks "when from the start of the incident," not "when from the owner's departure." Add the head-start time back.
Confusing still-water speed with stream speed. u is the rower's own speed. v is the current. Downstream = u + v. If you mix them up, your answer is the current speed, not the rowing speed.
Applying the harmonic mean formula to multi-day same-distance problems. If the same distance is covered at different times on different days, just use Total Distance / Total Time. Harmonic mean applies to two-speed, single-journey, same-distance problems only.
Speed fraction inversion error. If speed = p/q of usual, time = q/p (not p/q again). Slower speed means more time — the fraction flips. Getting this backward loses the question in one step.
Not checking sign of time change when speed exceeds usual. If the new speed is greater than usual (like 5/4), time decreases, so the person arrives early — treat as time saved, not delay. Writing the equation with the wrong sign gives a negative usual time.