Sarkari RiseLogin
UPSC CSE 2026 · PYQ · Reading Comprehension / Inference · medium

Which of the following conclusions is/are valid? 1. Only a serious offence as categorised by the revised JJ Act, justifies the transfer of a case to the adult judicial system. 2. The JJ Act, 2021, categorises an offence as a serious offence based on the maximum sentence it carries, rather than on the minimum sentence. Select the answer using the code given below.

  1. A.1 only
  2. B.2 only✓ Correct
  3. C.Both 1 and 2
  4. D.Neither 1 nor 2

Explanation

Statement 1 is invalid because the passage states that heinous offences (not serious offences) justify the transfer of a case to the adult criminal justice system; in fact, the passage explicitly says the new 'serious offence' category does NOT merit transfer to the adult criminal justice system. Statement 2 is valid because the passage clearly states that the JJ Act, 2021 categorises an offence with no minimum sentence but a maximum sentence of seven years or more as a serious offence — so the categorisation is based on the maximum sentence, not the minimum.
💡 Practice unlimited UPSC CSE PYQs + AI-tracked progress on each topic. Sign up free →

More Reading Comprehension / Inference questions

Want more UPSC CSE practice?

Free daily 10-Q quiz · adaptive mocks · 4,000+ verified PYQs · AI doubt solver in Hindi + English

Sign up freeMore Reading Comprehension / Inference practice