Sarkari RiseLogin
SSC MTS 2024 · PYQ · Syllogism · medium

Read the given statement(s) and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statement(s). Statements: No lizard is a snake. All lizards are reptiles. Conclusions: (I) At least some reptiles are snakes. (II) All reptiles are lizards.

  1. A.Both conclusions (I) and (II) follow
  2. B.Only conclusion I follows
  3. C.Only conclusion II follows
  4. D.Neither conclusion I nor II follows✓ Correct

Explanation

Since no lizard is a snake and all lizards are reptiles, we cannot conclude that some reptiles are snakes (snakes may or may not be reptiles based on given info). Conclusion II is also invalid as not all reptiles need to be lizards. Neither conclusion follows.
💡 Practice unlimited SSC MTS PYQs + AI-tracked progress on each topic. Sign up free →

More Syllogism questions

Want more SSC MTS practice?

Free daily 10-Q quiz · adaptive mocks · 4,000+ verified PYQs · AI doubt solver in Hindi + English

Sign up freeMore Syllogism practice