The Constitution of India contains several self-defining provisions that establish its own identity, commencement date, and relationship with prior colonial legislation — provisions often overlooked yet foundational to constitutional continuity.
Article 393 explicitly designates the document as 'the Constitution of India,' making Statement 1 incorrect. This seemingly simple provision carries legal significance: it anchors all subsequent references, judicial interpretations, and legislative citations to a single authoritative title, preventing ambiguity in constitutional discourse.
Article 395 expressly repeals both the Indian Independence Act, 1947 and the Government of India Act, 1935, along with their adaptations. Statement 2 is therefore incorrect. This repeal clause was essential to establish constitutional supremacy and sever the formal legal continuity with colonial governance frameworks.
Article 394 specifies that most provisions of the Constitution came into force on 26th January, 1950, making Statement 3 incorrect. Certain provisions — relating to elections, citizenship, and provisional Parliament — commenced on the date of adoption itself, reflecting a phased implementation design.
These terminal articles are not mere formalities; they define the constitutional order's temporal and normative boundaries. For administrators and courts, they resolve questions of legal succession, validity of pre-constitutional laws, and the precise moment from which fundamental rights and directive principles became operative.
All three statements are factually incorrect, as Articles 393, 394, and 395 directly address each claim. These provisions collectively mark the Constitution's self-contained, sovereign character — a clean break from colonial legal architecture.
GS Answer Coach grades your Mains answer on structure, substance, and conclusion — in under a minute.
Essay Coach · GS Answer Coach · Cutoff Planner · 500+ Mains PYQs — free to sign up.